One of the benefits of leaving the IT business world and returning to school to study physics was that I no longer had to listen to BusinessSpeak (tm). If you’ve worked in business, you’ve heard it. That obscure English dialect spoken by MBAs and marketing-types, chock-full of words and phrases like synergy, vertical silos, powerbase, etc. (Newbridge Networks, I’m looking at you!)

It’s bad enough that these people take perfectly good English words and toss them together haphazardly in bastard sentences whose only purpose is to hide the fact that either:

a) the product is late, doesn’t work as advertised, or is so vapourware that the ideal gas law applies.

or

b) the speaker went on a gatorade and rum binge the night before and has no idea what they’re talking about.

No, it doesn’t stop there. What’s worse is when the BusinessSpeak folks invent a new word. Take webinar for instance.

According to Wikipedia:

webinar is a specific type of web conference. It is typically one-way, from the speaker to the audience with limited audience interaction, such as in a webcast. A webinar can be very collaborative and include polling and question & answer sessions to allow full participation between the audience and the presenter. 

Now it’s obvious that webinar is fancy internet lingo for a seminar conducted over the web. Apparently, it was first used in 1998 and trademarked in 2000. But once all the other marketers heard the word, they started tossing it around too, and the trademark was eventually abandoned. These days it’s hard to find a company who doesn’t offer or participate in webinars.

So why does it bother me so much? Look at the word itself: web + seminar = webinar. So far, so good. But let’s look at the word seminar. From Webster’s Abridged Dictionary:

Sem`i*nar”\, n. [G. See Seminary, n.] A group of students engaged, under the guidance of an instructor, in original research in a particular line of study, and in the exposition of the results by theses, lectures, etc.; — called also seminary.

Dictionary.com has this to say about the origin of the word seminary:

[Origin: 1400–50; late ME: seed plot, nursery < L séminārium, equiv. to sémin- (s. of sémen) seed, semen -ārium -ary]

So seminar is a seed plot or nursery. I can understand how that translates to the idea of a lecture, ie: planting a seed of an idea in somebody’s head. But that means that seminar is really a compound word of sorts. When we replace “sem” with “web” in webinar, we’re no longer talking about the seed of an idea, are we?

Let’s look up the -ary suffix, again using the Dictionary.com site:

The suffix has the general sense “pertaining to, connected with” the referent named by the base;

So, that means that the word webinar has nothing to do with learning now. Instead, at best it means “something to do with the web”. Descriptive no? That means that just about anything you put on the web can be considered a webinar! The FOX news website? A webinar! My vacation videos? Webinars! The entire content of Break.com? Webinars! Those Paris Hilton sex videos? Webinars!

The next time your boss catches you on Facebook or MySpace, tell them it’s OK, you were just participating in a webinar.

 

Only you can stop Uwe Boll

7 Apr 2008 In: ramblings

Sign this petition and do your part in stopping Uwe Boll from producing more films. Who is Uwe Boll you ask? Mr. Boll is a German director and producer, and is responsible for a number of really, really bad films. Take a look at his Wikipedia entry for the gory details (oh, bad Mike!).

Apparently Mr. Boll has verbally agreed to stop producing films if one million people sign a petition against him. From the looks of things, the online petition has already reached 73957 signatures, approximately 7.4% of the way there!

Gary Jones, Dan Shea, Nat and I in front of the SG-1 gateOur alarm went off very early yesterday, so that we could haul our sorry selves out of bed and over to the Metrotown Hilton in Burnaby, BC where we boarded a bus bound for Bridge Studios. We spent the next hour and half touring the sets of Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis, and had a great time.

 

 

 

 

Some of our impressions:

  • The SG-1 gateroom is smaller than it looks on-screen.
  • The Atlantis gateroom set is gorgeous and very spacious. Despite what you see on-screen it isn’t very tall, although it has two floors.
  • The puddle jumper is awesome. It’s a complete mini-spaceship and totally enclosed.
  • The Daedalus set is very large and is composed of the bridge, several hallways and the engineering section.
  • You’d think Earth’s flagship spacecraft would be powered by all sorts of high-tech hardware. But from what I saw, the Daedalus is built out of throwaway circuit boards, old ISA expansion cards, and “ancient” Nortel and BCTel test equipment.
I’m not entirely sure if I’m allowed to post the photos we took (we had to sign a waiver to get access to the set), and to be honest many of them didn’t turn out well due to poor lighting. There was a pro photographer on hand, taking photos of people in front of the SG-1 stargate. We posed for a shot with Gary Jones and Dan Shea (above). Since the photo was taken by the official photographer, it should be OK to post.

 

About this space

My name is Mike Kelly. I'm a Vancouver-based technologist and non-practicing physicist. strangely entangled is my home base on the internet. If you look hard enough you'll find some blog postings, articles, photos and other stuff I thought might be interesting

You can also find me on del.icio.us, Twitter, and Jaiku.

Flickr PhotoStream

    Alternate FloorMy new officeDeer FriendEagle

Recent Sightings